The article gave complete credence to Tracys study and opinions. Tracy, Hart and Martens, Death and Science: The Existential Underpinnings of Belief in Intelligent Design and Discomfort with Evolution, PLo S One, 6(3): e17349. Time to turn the tables and psychoanalyze the psychs.
Wasnt it fear of death and judgment that turned many a Darwinist to atheism a convenient escape from worry about the hereafter? And isnt it easy for anyone to call their critics crazy?
- club dating online single site
- Cam2cam sex roulette
- funny dating site headlines
- comixology pull list app not updating
- Chinese sex chat portal
- adult book dating guest
University of British Columbia that alleges, Death anxiety prompts people to believe in intelligent design, reject evolution. A contrived psychological survey, replete with imagining ones own death and then reading quotes from Michael Behe and Richard Dawkins, scared 1,674 respondents into indicating a preference for intelligent design (ID), unless they read another passage from Carl Sagans writings reassuring them that naturalism can provide a sense of meaning, after which they showed reduced affinity for ID.
This led psychologist Jessica Tracy to claim, These findings suggest that individuals can come to see evolution as a meaningful solution to existential concerns, but may need to be explicitly taught that taking a naturalistic approach to understanding life can be highly meaningful. The poll was intentionally biased.
Readers have been responding enthusiastically; you can, too!
Look at the rotating globe on the right sidebar and ponder how many countries have accessed our material in the last month. Click the DONATE button at right, and thank you in advance for your partnership.
How about reading the ID literature instead of playing mental games on lay people?
Can you believe it a scientific paper that rules out the validity of an opposing theory right in the front of the abstract.
Dawkins, like the majority of scientists, argues that lifes origins are best explained by Charles Darwins theory of natural selection. author and biochemist, assert that complex biochemical and cellular structures are too complex to be explained by evolutionary mechanisms and should be attributed to a supernatural creator.
However, intelligent design advocates such as Prof. Intelligent is: The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection. ID makes no claim about supernatural causes or God.
Who are they kidding that evolution has loads of evidence and ID has none? This pseudo-academic study is wrong on so many levels.